Skip to content
homeaboutworkprojectsthesiswritingresume
Loading
~/blog/change-of-measure0%dark
  1. home/
  2. writing/
  3. Change of Measure and Girsanov's Theorem

25 May 2026 · 4 min read · updated 13 June 2026

Change of Measure and Girsanov's Theorem

An equivalent change of measure is carried by a positive martingale, the density process. We prove that the Radon-Nikodym density restricted to each sigma-algebra is a martingale, derive the Bayes rule that computes conditional expectations under the new measure, and present Girsanov's theorem, under which a Brownian motion acquires a drift while its quadratic variation is unchanged. The construction turns a real-world model into a martingale model and is the analytic content of an equivalent martingale measure.

  • 4 equations
  • 6 results
  • 9 connections
  • stochastic-processes
  • probability
On this page▾
  • The density process
  • The Bayes rule
  • Girsanov's theorem

4 min left

  • The density process1m
  • The Bayes rule1m
  • Girsanov's theorem2m

Replacing one measure by an equivalent one reweights probability without altering which events are negligible. On a filtered space the reweighting is dynamic, carried by a positive martingale whose terminal value is the Radon-Nikodym density. The same device removes a drift from a Brownian motion and converts a model under the physical measure into a model under which discounted prices are martingales.

#The density process

Let Q∼P\Q\sim\PQ∼P on FT\F_TFT​ with density ZT= dQ/ dPZ_T=\dd\Q/\dd\PZT​=dQ/dP, a positive integrable random variable with EP[ZT]=1\E_\P[Z_T]=1EP​[ZT​]=1. Define the density process Zt=EP[ZT∣Ft]Z_t=\E_\P[Z_T\mid\F_t]Zt​=EP​[ZT​∣Ft​] for t≤Tt\le Tt≤T.

Proposition1

The density process ZZZ is a positive P\PP-martingale, and on Ft\F_tFt​ the restriction of Q\QQ has P\PP-density ZtZ_tZt​, that is Q(A)=EP[Zt 1A]\Q(A)=\E_\P[Z_t\,\mathbf 1_A]Q(A)=EP​[Zt​1A​] for A∈FtA\in\F_tA∈Ft​.

Proof

As a conditional expectation of a fixed integrable variable, ZZZ is a martingale by the tower property, EP[Zt∣Fs]=EP[EP[ZT∣Ft]∣Fs]=EP[ZT∣Fs]=Zs\E_\P[Z_t\mid\F_s]=\E_\P[\E_\P[Z_T\mid\F_t]\mid\F_s]=\E_\P[Z_T\mid\F_s]=Z_sEP​[Zt​∣Fs​]=EP​[EP​[ZT​∣Ft​]∣Fs​]=EP​[ZT​∣Fs​]=Zs​. It is strictly positive, for if A={Zt=0}∈FtA=\{Z_t=0\}\in\F_tA={Zt​=0}∈Ft​ then 0=EP[Zt 1A]=EP[ZT 1A]0=\E_\P[Z_t\,\mathbf 1_A]=\E_\P[Z_T\,\mathbf 1_A]0=EP​[Zt​1A​]=EP​[ZT​1A​], which with ZT>0Z_T>0ZT​>0 a.s. forces P(A)=0\P(A)=0P(A)=0, so Zt>0Z_t>0Zt​>0 P\PP-a.s. and the division by ZsZ_sZs​ below is legitimate. For A∈FtA\in\F_tA∈Ft​ the defining property of conditional expectation gives EP[Zt 1A]=EP[ZT 1A]=EQ[1A]=Q(A)\E_\P[Z_t\,\mathbf 1_A]=\E_\P[Z_T\,\mathbf 1_A]=\E_\Q[\mathbf 1_A]=\Q(A)EP​[Zt​1A​]=EP​[ZT​1A​]=EQ​[1A​]=Q(A), where the middle equality is the defining change of measure on FT\F_TFT​, valid for AAA because A∈Ft⊆FTA\in\F_t\subseteq\F_TA∈Ft​⊆FT​.

#The Bayes rule

Theorem2

For 0≤s≤t≤T0\le s\le t\le T0≤s≤t≤T and an Ft\F_tFt​-measurable integrable XXX,

EQ[X∣Fs]=EP[Zt X∣Fs]ZsQ-almost surely.(1)\E_\Q[X\mid\F_s]=\frac{\E_\P[Z_t\,X\mid\F_s]}{Z_s}\qquad\Q\text{-almost surely.} \tag{1}EQ​[X∣Fs​]=Zs​EP​[Zt​X∣Fs​]​Q-almost surely.(1)
Proof

The right side is Fs\F_sFs​-measurable, so it suffices to check the averaging identity over an arbitrary A∈FsA\in\F_sA∈Fs​. Extending Proposition 1 from indicators to Ft\F_tFt​-measurable Y≥0Y\ge0Y≥0 by monotone convergence, and then to integrable YYY by splitting into positive and negative parts, gives EQ[Y]=EP[ZtY]\E_\Q[Y]=\E_\P[Z_t Y]EQ​[Y]=EP​[Zt​Y]; here Y=1AXY=\mathbf 1_A XY=1A​X with EP[Zt∣X∣]=EQ[∣X∣]<∞\E_\P[Z_t|X|]=\E_\Q[|X|]<\inftyEP​[Zt​∣X∣]=EQ​[∣X∣]<∞, so every term is finite. Using this at level ttt, then the tower property,

EQ[1AX]=EP[Zt 1AX]=EP[1A EP[ZtX∣Fs]]=EP ⁣[1A Zs EP[ZtX∣Fs]Zs],(2)\E_\Q[\mathbf 1_A X]=\E_\P[Z_t\,\mathbf 1_A X]=\E_\P\big[\mathbf 1_A\,\E_\P[Z_t X\mid\F_s]\big]=\E_\P\!\left[\mathbf 1_A\,Z_s\,\frac{\E_\P[Z_t X\mid\F_s]}{Z_s}\right], \tag{2}EQ​[1A​X]=EP​[Zt​1A​X]=EP​[1A​EP​[Zt​X∣Fs​]]=EP​[1A​Zs​Zs​EP​[Zt​X∣Fs​]​],(2)

and the last expression equals EQ[1A EP[ZtX∣Fs]/Zs]\E_\Q\big[\mathbf 1_A\,\E_\P[Z_t X\mid\F_s]/Z_s\big]EQ​[1A​EP​[Zt​X∣Fs​]/Zs​] by Proposition 1 at level sss. The two sides agree over every A∈FsA\in\F_sA∈Fs​, which is Equation (1).

#Girsanov's theorem

The density that removes a drift is a Doleans (stochastic) exponential. For a predictable θ\thetaθ with ∫0Tθs2 ds<∞\int_0^T\theta_s^2\,ds<\infty∫0T​θs2​ds<∞ a.s., so that the Ito integral and the exponential are defined, the Doleans exponential of the Brownian integral is

Zt=exp⁡ ⁣(∫0tθs dWs−12∫0tθs2 ds),(3)Z_t=\exp\!\left(\int_0^t\theta_s\,dW_s-\tfrac12\int_0^t\theta_s^2\,ds\right), \tag{3}Zt​=exp(∫0t​θs​dWs​−21​∫0t​θs2​ds),(3)

the unique solution of dZt=Zt θt dWtdZ_t=Z_t\,\theta_t\,dW_tdZt​=Zt​θt​dWt​. It is a positive local martingale, and a true martingale under the Novikov condition EP[exp⁡(12∫0Tθs2 ds)]<∞\E_\P[\exp(\tfrac12\int_0^T\theta_s^2\,ds)]<\inftyEP​[exp(21​∫0T​θs2​ds)]<∞ [1].

Theorem3

Let WWW be a P\PP-Brownian motion and let ZZZ from Equation (3) be a martingale on [0,T][0,T][0,T]. Define Q\QQ by  dQ/ dP=ZT\dd\Q/\dd\P=Z_TdQ/dP=ZT​. Then

W~t=Wt−∫0tθs ds(4)\widetilde W_t=W_t-\int_0^t\theta_s\,ds \tag{4}Wt​=Wt​−∫0t​θs​ds(4)

is a Brownian motion under Q\QQ.

Proof

By Levy's characterization it suffices that W~\widetilde WW is a continuous Q\QQ-local martingale with ⟨W~⟩t=t\langle\widetilde W\rangle_t=t⟨W⟩t​=t. Subtracting the finite-variation drift ∫0tθs ds\int_0^t\theta_s\,ds∫0t​θs​ds leaves the bracket unchanged, so ⟨W~⟩t=⟨W⟩t=t\langle\widetilde W\rangle_t=\langle W\rangle_t=t⟨W⟩t​=⟨W⟩t​=t under P\PP; since quadratic variation is an a.s. pathwise limit it is invariant under the equivalent change of measure, so ⟨W~⟩t=t\langle\widetilde W\rangle_t=t⟨W⟩t​=t holds Q\QQ-a.s. as Levy under Q\QQ requires. For the martingale property, the product rule applied to ZtW~tZ_t\widetilde W_tZt​Wt​ gives d(ZW~)=Z dW~+W~ dZ+d⟨Z,W~⟩d(Z\widetilde W)=Z\,d\widetilde W+\widetilde W\,dZ+d\langle Z,\widetilde W\rangled(ZW)=ZdW+WdZ+d⟨Z,W⟩, and substituting dZ=Zθ dWdZ=Z\theta\,dWdZ=ZθdW, dW~=dW−θ dtd\widetilde W=dW-\theta\,dtdW=dW−θdt, and d⟨Z,W~⟩=Zθ dtd\langle Z,\widetilde W\rangle=Z\theta\,dtd⟨Z,W⟩=Zθdt shows the drift terms cancel, leaving d(ZW~)=Z(1+θW~) dWd(Z\widetilde W)=Z(1+\theta\widetilde W)\,dWd(ZW)=Z(1+θW)dW, a driftless Ito integral, so ZW~Z\widetilde WZW is a P\PP-local martingale. Since ZZZ is a strictly positive P\PP-martingale and ZW~Z\widetilde WZW is a P\PP-local martingale, W~\widetilde WW is a Q\QQ-local martingale, because multiplication by ZZZ is a bijection between Q\QQ-local martingales and P\PP-local martingales, the local form of the Bayes correspondence of Theorem 2 [2]. That is exactly the Q\QQ-local martingale property that Levy's characterization consumes.

Choosing θ\thetaθ to cancel the drift of a discounted price turns that price into a Q\QQ-martingale, so Q\QQ is an equivalent martingale measure. The density ZTZ_TZT​ is the likelihood ratio between the physical and pricing measures.

[1]
I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed. Springer, 1991.
[2]
D. Revuz and M. Yor, Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, 3rd ed. Springer, 1999.

Part 6 of 8 in Stochastic Calculus

← previousIto's Formulanext →Stochastic Differential Equations

Explore connections

see in the atlas →

related

  • The Radon-Nikodym Theorem
  • The Stochastic Integral
  • Martingales

referenced by (1)

  • The Black-Scholes Equation
cite
@misc{change-of-measure,
  author = {Zac Kienzle},
  title  = {Change of Measure and Girsanov's Theorem},
  year   = {2026},
  month  = {05},
  url    = {https://zackienzle.com/blog/change-of-measure}
}