Skip to content
homeaboutworkprojectsthesiswritingresume
Loading
~/blog/l2-and-completeness0%dark
  1. home/
  2. writing/
  3. L-squared and Completeness

11 May 2026 · 5 min read · updated 13 June 2026

L-squared and Completeness

The two concrete Hilbert spaces every later argument uses are the square-integrable functions and the square-summable sequences. We define both, show the inner product is finite by Cauchy-Schwarz, and prove the Riesz-Fischer theorem that they are complete in the mean-square norm, so that a Cauchy sequence of square-integrable functions converges to a square-integrable limit. Completeness is what promotes these inner product spaces to Hilbert spaces and is the property the stochastic integral and conditional expectation are built on.

  • 2 equations
  • 5 results
  • 12 connections
  • functional-analysis
  • hilbert-space
  • measure-theory
On this page▾
  • The space of square-integrable functions
  • The Riesz-Fischer theorem
  • Separability

5 min left

  • The space of square-integrable functions2m
  • The Riesz-Fischer theorem2m
  • Separability1m

A Hilbert space needs two things, an inner product and completeness. The inner product supplies the geometry, and completeness supplies the limits, without which an orthogonal series has no vector to converge to. This post produces the two concrete Hilbert spaces the rest of the curriculum runs on, the square-integrable functions L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) and the square-summable sequences ℓ2\ell^2ℓ2, and proves the one nontrivial fact about them, that they are complete. The proof rests on the convergence theorems of measures and integration [1].

#The space of square-integrable functions

Fix a measure space (Ω,A,μ)(\Omega,\mathcal A,\mu)(Ω,A,μ). A measurable function fff is square-integrable when ∫∣f∣2 dμ<∞\int\abs{f}^2\,d\mu<\infty∫∣f∣2dμ<∞, and L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) is the set of such functions with two identified when they agree almost everywhere, so its elements are equivalence classes modulo null sets. It is a vector space, because ∣f+g∣2≤2∣f∣2+2∣g∣2\abs{f+g}^2\le 2\abs{f}^2+2\abs{g}^2∣f+g∣2≤2∣f∣2+2∣g∣2 keeps a sum square-integrable, and over the real scalars it carries the candidate inner product

⟨f,g⟩=∫Ωfg dμ,∥f∥2=(∫Ω∣f∣2 dμ)1/2.(1)\ip{f}{g}=\int_\Omega fg\,d\mu,\qquad \norm{f}_2=\Big(\int_\Omega\abs{f}^2\,d\mu\Big)^{1/2}. \tag{1}⟨f,g⟩=∫Ω​fgdμ,∥f∥2​=(∫Ω​∣f∣2dμ)1/2.(1)
Proposition1

The inner product Equation (1) is finite for all f,g∈L2(μ)f,g\in L^2(\mu)f,g∈L2(μ), and it makes L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) an inner product space.

Proof

Finiteness is the pointwise bound ∣fg∣≤12(∣f∣2+∣g∣2)\abs{fg}\le\half(\abs{f}^2+\abs{g}^2)∣fg∣≤21​(∣f∣2+∣g∣2), which integrates to ∫∣fg∣ dμ≤12(∥f∥22+∥g∥22)<∞\int\abs{fg}\,d\mu\le\half(\norm{f}_2^2+\norm{g}_2^2)<\infty∫∣fg∣dμ≤21​(∥f∥22​+∥g∥22​)<∞, so ∫fg dμ\int fg\,d\mu∫fgdμ is a well-defined finite number. Once it exists, the abstract Cauchy-Schwarz inequality sharpens this to ∫∣fg∣ dμ≤∥f∥2∥g∥2\int\abs{fg}\,d\mu\le\norm{f}_2\norm{g}_2∫∣fg∣dμ≤∥f∥2​∥g∥2​. Bilinearity and symmetry are linearity of the integral. Positive definiteness needs the null-set identification, since ∫f2 dμ=0\int f^2\,d\mu=0∫f2dμ=0 forces f2=0f^2=0f2=0 almost everywhere, that is f=0f=0f=0 as an element of L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ). The form is therefore an inner product. Over the complex scalars one takes ⟨f,g⟩=∫Ωfgˉ dμ\ip{f}{g}=\int_\Omega f\bar g\,d\mu⟨f,g⟩=∫Ω​fgˉ​dμ instead, with ⟨f,f⟩=∫∣f∣2 dμ\ip{f}{f}=\int\abs{f}^2\,d\mu⟨f,f⟩=∫∣f∣2dμ and conjugate symmetry ⟨g,f⟩=⟨f,g⟩‾\ip{g}{f}=\overline{\ip{f}{g}}⟨g,f⟩=⟨f,g⟩​, and the same argument runs with ∣f∣2\abs{f}^2∣f∣2 in place of f2f^2f2.

The sequence space ℓ2\ell^2ℓ2 is the special case Ω=N\Omega=\NΩ=N with counting measure, the square-summable real sequences x=(xn)x=(x_n)x=(xn​) with ∑nxn2<∞\sum_n x_n^2<\infty∑n​xn2​<∞ and ⟨x,y⟩=∑nxnyn\ip{x}{y}=\sum_n x_ny_n⟨x,y⟩=∑n​xn​yn​. Everything proved for L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) holds for ℓ2\ell^2ℓ2 by reading the integral as a sum.

#The Riesz-Fischer theorem

The one property that is not formal is completeness. It is a theorem, and it is exactly where the convergence theorems of integration earn their place.

Theorem2

L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) is complete. Every Cauchy sequence in the mean-square norm converges to an element of L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ).

Proof

Let (fn)(f_n)(fn​) be Cauchy in L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ). Choose a subsequence fn1,fn2,…f_{n_1},f_{n_2},\dotsfn1​​,fn2​​,… that converges fast, ∥fnk+1−fnk∥2≤2−k\norm{f_{n_{k+1}}-f_{n_k}}_2\le 2^{-k}∥fnk+1​​−fnk​​∥2​≤2−k, which is possible because the sequence is Cauchy. Set

g=∑k=1∞∣fnk+1−fnk∣,(2)g=\sum_{k=1}^\infty\abs{f_{n_{k+1}}-f_{n_k}}, \tag{2}g=k=1∑∞​∣fnk+1​​−fnk​​∣,(2)

a nondecreasing limit of partial sums. The triangle inequality in L2L^2L2 gives each partial sum norm at most ∑k2−k=1\sum_k 2^{-k}=1∑k​2−k=1, so by the monotone convergence theorem applied to the squared partial sums, ∥g∥2≤1\norm{g}_2\le 1∥g∥2​≤1 and in particular g<∞g<\inftyg<∞ almost everywhere. Where ggg is finite the telescoping series fn1+∑k(fnk+1−fnk)f_{n_1}+\sum_k(f_{n_{k+1}}-f_{n_k})fn1​​+∑k​(fnk+1​​−fnk​​) converges absolutely, so fnkf_{n_k}fnk​​ converges pointwise almost everywhere to a limit fff, with ∣f∣≤∣fn1∣+g∈L2(μ)\abs{f}\le\abs{f_{n_1}}+g\in L^2(\mu)∣f∣≤∣fn1​​∣+g∈L2(μ), so f∈L2(μ)f\in L^2(\mu)f∈L2(μ). Each difference obeys ∣f−fnk∣2≤(∣f∣+∣fnk∣)2≤(2∣fn1∣+2g)2\abs{f-f_{n_k}}^2\le(\abs{f}+\abs{f_{n_k}})^2\le(2\abs{f_{n_1}} +2g)^2∣f−fnk​​∣2≤(∣f∣+∣fnk​​∣)2≤(2∣fn1​​∣+2g)2, an integrable dominator independent of kkk, so the dominated convergence theorem gives ∥f−fnk∥2→0\norm{f-f_{n_k}}_2\to 0∥f−fnk​​∥2​→0. The subsequence converges in L2L^2L2 to fff, and a Cauchy sequence with a convergent subsequence converges to the same limit, so fn→ff_n\to ffn​→f in L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ).

On a measure space carrying two disjoint sets A,BA,BA,B with 0<μ(A)=μ(B)<∞0<\mu(A)=\mu(B)<\infty0<μ(A)=μ(B)<∞, L2L^2L2 is the only LpL^pLp that is a Hilbert space, since by the Jordan-von Neumann characterisation the LpL^pLp norm obeys the parallelogram law only at p=2p=2p=2. Taking f=μ(A)−1/p1Af=\mu(A)^{-1/p}\mathbf 1_Af=μ(A)−1/p1A​ and g=μ(B)−1/p1Bg=\mu(B)^{-1/p}\mathbf 1_Bg=μ(B)−1/p1B​ gives ∥f∥p=∥g∥p=1\norm{f}_p=\norm{g}_p=1∥f∥p​=∥g∥p​=1 and, by disjoint supports, ∥f±g∥pp=2\norm{f\pm g}_p^p=2∥f±g∥pp​=2, so ∥f+g∥p2+∥f−g∥p2=2⋅22/p\norm{f+g}_p^2+\norm{f-g}_p^2=2\cdot 2^{2/p}∥f+g∥p2​+∥f−g∥p2​=2⋅22/p against 2∥f∥p2+2∥g∥p2=42\norm{f}_p^2+2\norm{g}_p^2=42∥f∥p2​+2∥g∥p2​=4, equal iff p=2p=2p=2. On a degenerate space (a single atom) every Lp≅RL^p\cong\RLp≅R is trivially Hilbert. The Riesz-Fischer theorem makes that inner product space complete, and the combination is the definition of a Hilbert space met in the previous post.

Corollary3

L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) and ℓ2\ell^2ℓ2 are Hilbert spaces.

#Separability

For the expansion theory to come, a Hilbert space should have a countable dense subset, a property called separability, since then it admits a countable orthonormal basis. The space ℓ2\ell^2ℓ2 is separable, with the finitely supported rational sequences dense in it, and the standard unit vectors ene_nen​, with a one in position nnn, form an orthonormal basis. The space L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) is separable for reasonable measures, for instance Lebesgue measure on a bounded interval [a,b][a,b][a,b]. There the polynomials with rational coefficients are dense, since C[a,b]C[a,b]C[a,b] is dense in L2[a,b]L^2[a,b]L2[a,b], polynomials are sup-norm dense in C[a,b]C[a,b]C[a,b] by Stone-Weierstrass, and ∥⋅∥2≤(b−a)1/2∥⋅∥∞\norm{\cdot}_2\le(b-a)^{1/2}\norm{\cdot}_\infty∥⋅∥2​≤(b−a)1/2∥⋅∥∞​ on [a,b][a,b][a,b] transfers the density. On an unbounded interval no nonzero polynomial lies in L2L^2L2, so a different countable family is needed there, for instance step functions on rational subintervals with rational values. Separability is not automatic, but the spaces that arise from processes and operators here all have it, so a countable orthonormal basis is always available. This is the structural fact the Karhunen-Loeve expansion and every Fourier argument exploit.

With the inner product from the previous post and the completeness proved here, L2L^2L2 is the Hilbert space the analysis of the rest of the curriculum takes place in, the space in which orthogonal expansions converge, conditional expectation projects, and the stochastic integral is defined.

[1]
W. Rudin, Functional Analysis, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1991.

Part 2 of 7 in Hilbert Spaces and Operators

← previousInner Product Spacesnext →Projection and Riesz Representation

Explore connections

see in the atlas →

related

  • Measures and Integration
  • The Stochastic Integral
  • Orthonormal Bases

referenced by (6)

  • Orthonormal Bases
  • Probability Spaces and Random Variables
  • Projection and Riesz Representation
  • Second-Order Processes and Mean-Square Calculus
  • The Construction of Brownian Motion
  • The L-p Spaces
cite
@misc{l2-and-completeness,
  author = {Zac Kienzle},
  title  = {L-squared and Completeness},
  year   = {2026},
  month  = {05},
  url    = {https://zackienzle.com/blog/l2-and-completeness}
}